Voris v. Aetna Life Ins.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
Defendant, by two separate group insurance policies, insured employees of the Barnsdall Corporation, and its “associated and operated companies” — one of which being the Barnsdall Oil Company. Plaintiff, ' as an employee of the. Barnsdall Oil Company, was issued a certificate of insurance under each of these policies; the certificate under one policy being dated June 1, 1920, and that under the other, September 1, 1926. The policies were procured from defendant by the Barnsdall Company as a part of an insurance program devised by the company for its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCorkle v. Texas Benevolent Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- All States Life Ins. Co. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Cotten v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1890
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Deese v. Travellers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baum v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. ThorntonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Geisenhoff v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Ætna Life Insurance v. VorisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939