Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1967No. 270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The statement of facts discloses the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit, and a careful consideration of each of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error.

On cross-examination, after defendant had stated positively that his criminal record consisted of only one conviction of larceny and one conviction of assault, over his objection, the solicitor elicited from him the admission that he had also been convicted of store-breaking and larceny, larceny of an automobile, hit and run, operating a motor vehicle without an operator’s license,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. LambeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. NorkettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Doss Ex Rel. Doss v. SewellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. Lewis Burley FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API