Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 4, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 20982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on motions for summary judgment by both plaintiff and defendant.
The United States Army Map Services, an agency of the plaintiff, invited sealed bids to be received on or before May 28, 1947, for an aerial photography contract. Defendant Clarke L. Smith, individually and trading as C. L. Smith Aerial Surveys (hereinafter called “Smith”), submitted the low bid and was verbally notified on May 29 that he had been awarded the contract by which, for $99,-596.18, Smith agreed to take and deliver certain aerial photography to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- United States v. A. L. Ulvedal, D/B/A Ulvedal Construction Company, and United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Hammer Contracting Corporation and Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Hammer Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Seaboard Lumber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.