Legal Opinion

Williams v. Stansbury

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1983No. C-1502PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is an action on a promissory note. 1 Williams purchased a promissory note without knowledge that it had been subjected to a suit for garnishment. The question is whether Williams must intervene in the garnishment proceeding in order to protect his rights in the note. The trial court held Williams was estopped to recover the proceeds of the note which had been paid to the garnishor. The court of appeals affirmed. 634 S.W.2d 924 (Tex.App.1982). Our per curiam opinion dated November 10, 1982, is withdrawn. We reform the judgment of the court of appeals and, as reformed,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Storms v. TuckTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gause v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Thompson v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Favors v. YaffeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Intercontinental Terminals Co. v. Hollywood Marine, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Trevino v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Trevino)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Casa El Sol-Acapulco, S.A. v. Fontenot, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. First National Bank of Amarillo v. Jarnigan, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  4. City of Houston v. McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. IFC Credit Corp. v. Specialty Optical Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API