Legal Opinion

In Re Ratmansky

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1980No. 19-10079PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

There are two issues before us which, because of their interrelationship, we will consider in this opinion. One involves the motion of a creditor to dismiss the debtor’s Chapter 13 case and the other embraces the confirmation of the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan. While we cannot dismiss the instant case for any of the reasons advanced by the creditor, we conclude that the debtor’s case should be dismissed because the debtor’s plan cannot be confirmed because of the lack of good faith demonstrated by the debtor before this court.

The facts of the instant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Del. for New Castle Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
In Re Stuart R. And Shiela M. Terry, Debtors, A. L. Tenney, Trustee v. Stuart R. And Shiela M. Terry, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
In Re AughenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
In re Fixen & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
Harry Harold Chereton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

In Re PowersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1991
In Re Martin-TrigonaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
In Re Nicolet, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
In Re HogueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
Kehm v. Citicorp Homeowners Service, Inc. (In Re Kehm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.