Legal Opinion

Manning v. Foster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1908No. 7186PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered October 26, 1907, upon sustaining a motion for nonsuit, dismissing an action for specific perform.ance.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This was an action to enforce specific performance of an alleged escrow agreement. On the 18th of December, 1905, the defendant Henry Foster executed a deed for the land in question, at a consideration of $4,500, and by *542agreement with plaintiff placed said deed in escrow with certain bankers in Chehalis. With the deed there was deposited cash in the sum of $2,854.63, a promissory note for $500, and certain warrants amounting to $1,145.37, a total of $4,500. It was understood that the wife of defendant was to come and sign and acknoAvledge the deed, and that the warrants were to be indorsed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Engler v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Perry v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lechner v. HallingWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Nelson v. AltizerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Williamson v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. McLain v. HealyWashington Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API