Legal Opinion

United States v. Kermit Miner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1997No. 97-1918Published

1Opinion of the Court

131 F.3d 1271

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Kermit MINER, Appellant.

No. 97-1918.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1997.

Decided Dec. 23, 1997.

Bernard Eugene Duffy, Fort Pierre, SD, argued, for appellant.

Mikal Hanson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pierre, SD, argued (Karen E. Scheier, on the brief), for appellee.

Before LOKEN, HEANEY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

1

Kermit Miner appeals his conviction of abusive sexual contact with a minor, alleging that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient and that the victim recanted her testimony. We affirm.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Timothy Duane Arcoren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API