Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc. v. Litz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1980No. 40726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition in which Relator seeks to prohibit Respondent from proceeding in a class action suit brought by Richard Bardes and others on behalf of themselves and other real property owners who had been customers of Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc. In this proceeding we have been favored with briefs by Missouri Public Service Commission (Commission) and by the Office of Public Counsel (Public Counsel) as amici curiae. The plaintiffs in the underlying action will be referred to as plaintiffs.

The essential facts are not in dispute. It is only the legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Straube v. Bowling Green Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. STATE EX INF. VOIGTS, ETC. v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reinhold v. Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Environmental Utilities, LLC v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Gaines v. GibbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. In the Matter of the Application of Osage Utility Operating Company, Inc., to Acquire Certain Water and Sewer Assets and for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity Public Water Supply District No. 5 of Camden County, Lake Area Waste Water Association, Inc., Missouri Water Association, Inc., and Cedar Glen Condominium Owners Association, Inc. and Office of the Public Counsel v. Missouri Public Service Commission and Osage Utility Operating Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Missouri Landowners Alliance v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API