Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

— This ease was argued before this court, both in division and en banc. We adopt the statement of facts of the divisional opinion as it fairly and correctly states the facts as found in the record. It is as follows:

“This is an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County, affirming, on certiorari, the orders of respondent commission in two cases, being commission eases Nos. 6722 and 6723, in which the commission granted the applications of Utilities Power and Light Corporation for authority to purchase, acquire and hold more than ten per cent of the shares of stock ‘at any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. In Re RahnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. AG Processing, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Lucas v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Miles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API