Legal Opinion

In re Aulston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 13, 2006No. 2005-B-1546PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

|! Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 21(A),1 the Office of Disciplinary Counsel *462(“ODC”) has filed a motion for reciprocal discipline against respondent, Robert P. Aulston, III, an attorney licensed to practice law in the States of Louisiana and Illinois, based upon discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois.

DISCIPLINARY BACKGROUND

Respondent was admitted to practice in Louisiana in 1974. In 1981, respondent was disbarred in Louisiana based upon his 1978 federal conviction for making misrepresentations to banks and federal institutions. Louisiana…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re AulstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. AulstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

4Cited by53 opinions

  1. In Re KanwalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In Re BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. In Re RushingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. In Re WaltersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  5. In re NunnerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API