Legal Opinion

In Re Bailey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 2010No. 2010-B-0426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM. *

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 21(A), the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed this reciprocal discipline proceeding against respondent, Joseph W. Bailey, an attorney licensed to practice law in the States of Louisiana and Texas, based upon discipline imposed by the State Bar of Texas.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In July 1993, respondent was appointed Guardian Ad Litem for Antoinette Gardner for purposes of a pending lawsuit. The lawsuit ultimately settled for $40,000. On May 20, 1994, the court executed an Order to Allocate Funds, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re AulstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. In re MayeuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. In re JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  3. In re MintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API