Legal Opinion

In re Aulston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 14, 2002No. 2002-B-1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

hPER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 21(A),1 the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed a motion for reciprocal discipline against respondent, Robert P. Aulston, III, an attorney licensed to practice law in the States of Louisiana and Illinois, based upon discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois.

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The record indicates that respondent was charged in the Illinois proceeding with two counts of misconduct relating to his handling of two client matters. In Count 1, it was alleged that respondent violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of South Memphis v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1855
  2. In re ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. In re SpearsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re AulstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API