Legal Opinion

Grant v. Aaa michigan/wisconsin, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2005No. Docket 249720PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeter, J.

Defendant appeals as on leave granted 1 from an order denying in part its motion for summary disposition in this case involving the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA), MCL 445.901 et seq. Defendant contends that plaintiffs claim brought under the MCPA was, in actuality, based on the no-fault act and was barred by the one-year limitations period found in that act. See MCL 500.3145(1). Defendant argues that the trial court erroneously allowed plaintiffs MCPA claim to proceed. On cross-appeal, plaintiff takes issue with the trial court’s treatment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Crown Technology Park v. D&N Bank, FSBMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. AAA Michigan/Wisconsin, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Buntea v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  3. Grant v. AAA MICHIGAN/WISCONSIN, INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API