Legal Opinion

Lane-Hill v. Ruth

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1995No. 85582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOPLIN, Judge:

Appellant Stacy Diane Lane-Hill seeks review of the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellees Franklin and Emogene Ruth in Lane-Hill’s action to recover damages resulting from the Ruths’ alleged negligence in allowing a tree limb to fall on Lane-Hill’s automobile as it passed the Ruths’ property. We find no error as alleged in the trial court’s order, and affirm.

The Ruths owned residential property in Oklahoma City. In September 1994, the Ruths hired defendant Rick Bischel of Rick’s Tree and Lawn Service to trim and/or remove a tree in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudgens v. Cook Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Cahill v. WaughCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Brown v. SaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMillan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3251, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5649 Lowell A. McMillan Michele L. McMillan Stephanie L. McMillan v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C. v. Midway Machining, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API