Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Waugh

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1986No. 63607PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

Was it error to withdraw from jury consideration one of plaintiffs’ theories of recovery for injury sustained while leaving defendant’s restaurant when hit by a missile shot from a lawn mower operated by defendant’s yard man? We hold it was and reverse.

I

One day during the summer of 1983, plaintiff Augustine Cahill and a co-worker were breakfast guests at a restaurant called The Pancake Place, owned and operated by defendant Tom Waugh in Tulsa, Oklahoma. They finished eating, paid for the meal, and had just passed through the entrance of the cafe when suddenly plaintiff’s leg…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Donroy, Ltd., Dostrey, Ltd., Lacancal, Ltd., and Transpat, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. DeatherageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. HavilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Janice v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Gorton v. DotyIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lane-Hill v. RuthCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Cahill v. WaughCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Gordon v. CRS Consulting Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C. v. Midway Machining, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2024
  5. Opinion No. (1990), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API