Legal Opinion

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Billings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1959No. 38195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant in error, Roy Billings, plaintiff below, brought this action on his amended petition to recover damages for personal injuries from F. C. Nunamaker, H. S. Barker, and the plaintiff in error, Safeway Stores, Inc. Trial was to a jury which returned its verdict in favor of the individual defendants but against the corporation in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was entered thereon and Safeway Stores, Inc. has appealed.

It appears, substantially without dispute, that plaintiff was injured as the consequence of a fall to the ground occasioned by his collision, after dark on the evening of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Linsley v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  4. Greenwood v. Lyles & Buckner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Ruocco v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haas v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. MusfeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Lane-Hill v. RuthCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Jones v. Western Auto SupplySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API