Dolph v. Wortman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Court. — J. B. Rockaebllow, Judge. Application by intervener and cross-petitioner defendants to vacate a judgment and for a new trial. After full bearing, the application was denied, and the intefvener and cross-petitioner defendants have appealed. —
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.
The original case was heard by us on appeal. Dolph v. Wortman, 185 Iowa 630. After a remand of the ease, and an entry of judgment in accord with our reversing opinion, the application to vacate judgment and for a new trial was made. The salient facts involved in the litigation are quite fully set forth in our former opinion, herein cited. "We shall not repeat these facts here, except in a very general way. Upon the record as now presented to us upon this application, we should not be justified in finding the facts other than as set forth in such former opinion. The plaintiff, Sena Dolph, is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKemey v. KetchumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Dolph v. WortmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lathrop v. KnoopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- In Re Estate of KinnanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Hayes v. MoffattMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Jeppesen v. JeppesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Brien v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.