Jeppesen v. Jeppesen
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.
The sole question we have is whether, prior to plaintiff’s marriage to decedent, there was a valid delivery of the deed under which defendants claim to be sole owners of the realty in which plaintiff-widow asserts her distributive share.
Following trial the district court held the deed was not so delivered and established plaintiff’s one-third share. While our review is de novo (rule 334, Rules of Civil Procedure) we give weight to the trial court’s findings. Nelson v. Nelson, 249 Iowa 638, 639, 87 N.W.2d 767, 768, and citation; Thompson v. Thompson, 240 Iowa 1162, 1171, 39 N.W.2d 132, 137,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Stiles v. BreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Klajbor v. KlajborIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Carlson v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oehler v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Brandt v. SchuchaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Klosterboer v. EngelkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Watts v. ArcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Forbes v. VolkWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.