Legal Opinion

Lacey v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 2010No. 02A05-0910-CR-562PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINFON

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

In this interlocutory appeal, Cornelius Tyrone Lacey, Sr. ("Lacey") challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant. We reverse.

Issues

Lacey presents two issues for review:

I. Whether evidence should be suppressed because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause; and

II. Whether evidence should be suppressed because the search warrant was executed as a "no-knock" warrant in violation of his rights under the Indiana Constitution.

Facts and Procedural History

During 2008, Fort Wayne Police began…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lacey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lacey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API