Legal Opinion · Dissent

Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 21, 2003No. 29049-9-IIPublished

1DissentArmstrong, J.

Because the trial court erred in ruling that RCW 49.60.224 prevents this kind of charitable gift to a church and also erred in applying equitable principles to effectively dissolve the trust, I dissent.

The trial court ruled that the trust provisions of the deed violate RCW 49.60.224, apparently reasoning that the perpetual gift language was intended as a discriminatory restriction on transfer of the property to “individuals of a specified .. . creed.” RCW 49.60.224. The court, accordingly, struck the deed language that Vaughn Community Church (VCC) held the property “for the perpetual use of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bayless v. Community College District No. XIXCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Townsend v. Charles Schalkenbach Home for Boys, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API