Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Charles Schalkenbach Home for Boys, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1949No. 30732PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is the fourth time that the will of Charles Sehalkenbach has been before this court. For a better understanding of the problem now confronting us, we deem it necessary to briefly review the controversies which have heretofore been before the courts.

On June 23, 1926, Charles and Minnie Sehalkenbach entered into an agreement to make mutual wills. The wills provided that the bulk of their community property would be placed in trust for the establishment of a municipal bank, or, in the alternative, for the establishment of a home for boys. Paragraph Seventh (d), of the husband’s will,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathiowetz v. StackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Reagh v. DickeyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Reagh v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Reagh v. SchalkenbachWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wade v. BartekWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Puget Sound Nat. Bank of Tacoma v. EasterdayWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re RiddellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. In re the Riddell Testamentary TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API