Legal Opinion

Bayless v. Community College District No. XIX

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 5, 1996No. 15663-0-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

M. Sully Bayless appeals the trial court’s ruling that RCW 42.40.050, which authorizes actions for damages for unlawful retaliation against whistleblowers, does not apply retroactively. We hold the 1992 amendment was retroactive and remand for a determination of actual damages.

Mr. Bayless was formerly the director of admissions and registrar at Columbia Basin College. In February 1985, Mr. Bayless contacted the state auditor pursuant to the _ "whistleblower” statute, RCW 42.40, to inform the auditor of what he perceived to be improprieties in the operation and conduct of the College. In May…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ludvigsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. City of Seattle v. LudvigsenWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carvin v. BritainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Letourneau v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API