Legal Opinion

Egan v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1916No. 5989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by James Egan against John. M. Ingram and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtThacker, J.

The plaintiff in error will be designated as plaintiff and the defendants in error as defendants, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

The plaintiff, alleging possession and title in himself, brought this action on March 22, 1913, to quiet title in himself to lots 1 and 2 of section 1, township 20 north, range 13 .east, in Tulsa county, Okla., against defendants, who, he alleges, assert some adverse right, title, and interest to this land under certain pretended conveyances, the nature of which he asks that they be required to disclose.

The defendant John M. Ingram,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. McKeever v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Truskett v. ClosserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. of Clinton v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Mortgage Debenture Co., Ltd. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. In Re Estate of HibdonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. First State Bank of Hewitt v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Hardesty v. GordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API