Legal Opinion

People v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: CPL 300.10 (2) provides that "[u]pon request of a defendant who did not testify in his own behalf, but not otherwise, the court must state that the fact that he did not testify is not a factor from which any inference unfavorable to the defendant may be drawn.” (Emphasis added.) The Court of Appeals has said that the statute does not establish an absolute prohibition against the court exercising its discretion to submit the "no inference” *869charge in the absence of a request by the defendant, but that this discretion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. VereenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. KobersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. NazarioNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API