Legal Opinion

Prenatt v. Runyon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1859PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Vigo Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

"Worden, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellee, on an account for goods sold and delivered.

The defendant answered—

1. By general denial.

2. That' the cause of action did not accrue within six years next before the commencement of the suit.

3. Payment.

To the second paragraph of the answer the plaintiff replied a£ follows, viz.;

*175“That the cause of action did not accrue within six years before the commencement of this action, for that some of the items on either side, as set forth in the plaintiff’s bill of particulars, are within six years before the commencement of this suit. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reno v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Neighbors v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hannan v. EngelmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Miller v. CinnamonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. McNeil v. Garland & NashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API