Legal Opinion
Hooker v. NORBU
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 2008No. 53A01-0804-CV-180PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Ronald Hooker appeals the trial court’s order calculating the damages owed to Hooker on his complaint for breach of contract against appellees-defendants Jigme K. Norbu and Yaling Huang (collectively, the appellees). Hooker argues that the trial court erroneously neglected to include interest payments that should have been made by the appel-lees as part of the damages award. Finding that Hooker elected the remedy of forfeiture rather than foreclosure and is therefore prohibited from recovering the missed payments, we affirm.
FACTS
On February 1,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Ogle v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Adsit Co., Inc. v. GustinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- McLemore v. McLemoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Powers v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Dr. Curtis K. Deason and Connie S. Deason v. Bill R. McWhorter and Heather McWhorter Revocable Living Trust, Dated January 24, 2003Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hooker v. NORBUIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Jon A. Zima v. Eric A. Kazmierzak (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Rachel Staggs v. Corena Buxbaum (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015