Legal Opinion
Hooker v. NORBU
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 2008No. 53A01-0804-CV-180Published
1Opinion of the Court
899 N.E.2d 655 (2008)
Ronald HOOKER, Appellant-Plaintiff,
v.
Jigme K. NORBU and Yaling Huang, Appellees-Defendants.
No. 53A01-0804-CV-180.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
December 11, 2008.
C. Richard Marshall, Columbus, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Craig Benson, Bloomington, IN, Attorney for Appellees.
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Ronald Hooker appeals the trial court's order calculating the damages owed to Hooker on his complaint for breach of contract against appellees-defendants Jigme K. Norbu and Yaling Huang (collectively, the appellees). Hooker argues that the trial court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Ogle v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Adsit Co., Inc. v. GustinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- McLemore v. McLemoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Powers v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.