State v. Federal Square Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The fundamental proposition upon which the claimants base their whole argument is stated in their brief as follows: “The deed of October 18, 1888, established a charitable trust for the benefit of the inhabitants of the City of Concord, with a resulting trust upon its termination in favor of the grantors and their representatives.” The claimants concede that unless some such trust relationship is found to exist “they would admittedly be entitled to receive no damages.”
That the deed established a public charity may not be doubted. Cities and towns may hold property in trust for public purposes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacDonald v. Board of Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Lutes v. Louisville Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamman v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Industrial National Bank of Providence v. ColtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Montara Water & Sanitary District v. County of San MateoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.