Legal Opinion

Montara Water & Sanitary District v. County of San Mateo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 26, 2009No. Case C 08-2814 JF (RS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

This action arises from a dispute over the ownership of three water wells located on the property of the Half Moon Bay Airport, a public facility owned since 1948 by the County of San Mateo, California (“the County”). Plaintiff Montara Water and Sanitary District (“Montara”) seeks to take the wells by eminent domain. The United States, acting through the Federal Aviation Administration (“the FAA”), has intervened to oppose Montara’s efforts. Each party has filed a motion for summary judgment asserting ownership of the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rio Grande City Consolidated Independent School District v. City of Rio Grande, Joel Villarreal-Mayor, Arcadio J. Salinas III-Comm. Place 1, Rey Ramirez-Comm. Place 2, Hernan R. Garza III-Comm. Place 3 and Dave Jones-Comm. Place 4 and Dave Jones-Comm. Place 4, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API