Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. City of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1962No. Civ. 6577PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J.—

The issue for determination in this action was whether the owner of a determinable fee estate in a parcel of real property, which was part of a larger parcel conveyed for a limited use, and which subsequently was taken through eminent domain proceedings, or the owner of the reversionary interest in the property taken, was entitled to the compensation awarded for such taking. The trial court found in favor of the latter. The primary issues on appeal are threefold, viz., (1) whether the evidence sustains a finding that the determinable fee estate had terminated before the taking in…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Fifer v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Utah Gospel Mission v. Salt Lake City Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 2004
  4. Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Prince v. Charles Ilfeld CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API