Legal Opinion

Milena Ship Management Co. v. Newcomb

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 28, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-2535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs move for summary judgment in the form of declaratory relief and a permanent injunction in an action to review a governmental administrative order blocking the plaintiffs’ ships as assets controlled or owned by the Yugoslavian government. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED. The facts have twice been stated in other written opinions, and need not be repeated here.

I

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 instructs that summary judgment is proper if the record discloses no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Co. v. Viskoza-LoznicaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998
  2. Milena Ship Management Co. v. NewcombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API