Legal Opinion
Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Co. v. Viskoza-Loznica
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided October 27, 1998No. 95-2291-TUBREPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
TURNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Procter & Gamble Cellulose Company brought this action against defendants Viskoza-Loznica, Progres, and Progres-Vis-koza (collectively “the Progres defendants”) alleging breach of contract in the failure to pay for delivered goods. Procter & Gamble’s complaint also named Investbanka Beograd and Beogradska Banka DD, New York Agency as defendants alleging a separate breach of contract in their refusal to honor several letters of credit. On April 24, 1997,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bailey v. Turbine Design, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Olin Corp. v. FISONS PLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Cruz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Signalquest, Inc. v. Tien-Ming ChouDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.