Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert HAIRSTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1995No. 94-50315PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, District Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2111, 2114 and 924(c)(1), and the ensuing sentence. Because we must reverse the conviction on one issue, we also address the other issues which are likely to arise on a new trial. However, “we refuse to speculate as to the outcome of this hypothetical second trial and therefore decline to address [defendant’s] sentencing argument at this time.” United States v. Moorehead, 57 F.3d 875, 877 (9th Cir.1995).
I
FACTS
On May 26, 1992, after having made two collections of money at the Veterans…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Malcolm Lee WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Michael Rudy ThamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. CollicottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rigoberto Castellanos-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Michael CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Lonnie LillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.