Legal Opinion

Arthur Atherton Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1970No. 28886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, a federal convict, appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm. 1

Appellant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was convicted on his pleas of guilty to three separate informations each charging a different violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912, falsely impersonating a federal employee. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of two years imprisonment on each charge.

In his motion to vacate sentence appellant claimed to be innocent of the crimes charged and contended that his guilty pleas were entered as a result…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Grant Cooper v. William C. Holman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Charles Burns Hornbrook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Joseph George HelmichCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Jose Julio Gonzalez-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API