Legal Opinion
United States v. Eristello Sesena Provencio, United States of America v. Filiberto Lizola-Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1977No. 76-3329, 76-3330PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants appeal from their convictions for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) (transporting aliens). On August 27, 1976, the lawyer for the five detained alien witnesses moved for their release. Counsel for appellants was present and stated that there was no objection to having the depositions of the aliens taken and having them released. The depositions were taken on August 31 and September 3, 1976. Counsel for appellants did not stipulate to the use of the depositions at trial. In fact, the aliens were not released and were still available at the time of trial. Without objection by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Norman Eugene LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sanchez v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Michael Ostlund v. Robert C. Bobb, Edward J. Cooper, City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gete v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Humberto RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.