Legal Opinion
Michael Ostlund v. Robert C. Bobb, Edward J. Cooper, City of Santa Ana
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1987No. 86-5538PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Appellant Michael Ostlund appeals an adverse ruling in his civil rights action. He asserts that the City of Santa Ana, California and its officials, Robert Bobb and Edward Cooper, violated his constitutional right to due process by not providing him with a hearing regarding the City’s denial of his claim for disability retirement benefits. The district court dismissed the action after conducting a pretrial conference. In dismissing the action the court ruled that the City was not required to grant Ostlund a hearing because he had not requested one. The court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Walls v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Brady v. GebbieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Blueford v. PruntyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sandra J. Knudson v. City of Ellensburg, Lawrence M. Loveless and Jane Doe Loveless, and the Marital Community Composed ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.