Legal Opinion

Endsley v. Luna

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 5, 2010No. CV 06-6961 DSF (SS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. (PC) Camposeco v. StamperDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (PC) Howard v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Kamilchu v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API