Endsley v. Luna
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- (PC) Camposeco v. StamperDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Howard v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Kamilchu v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.