Legal Opinion

(PC) Montecastro v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 25, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00689Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENDRIX MORENO MONTECASTRO, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00689-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 13 v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 NEWSOM, et al., ) [ECF No. 1] ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Hendrix Moreno Montecastro is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed May 18, 2020. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court is required to screen…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API