Legal Opinion

United States v. Vanderwerfhorst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2009No. 07-30336PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

We are once again asked to review the sentencing procedure where the underlying crime itself is not at issue. Jared Vanderwerfhorst, a convicted sex offender, pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). On appeal, he contends that the district court violated the notice requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h) when the court imposed a sentence above the advisory range set forth by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”). He also claims the court committed procedural…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. David RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Robert McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Stephen HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API