United States v. Vanderwerfhorst
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
We are once again asked to review the sentencing procedure where the underlying crime itself is not at issue. Jared Vanderwerfhorst, a convicted sex offender, pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). On appeal, he contends that the district court violated the notice requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h) when the court imposed a sentence above the advisory range set forth by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”). He also claims the court committed procedural…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. David RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Robert McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Stephen HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.