State v. Shawn Kelley

¶ 1. Defendant Shawn Kelley argues that this Court should vacate his domestic assault conviction because numerous reversible errors occurred during his jury trial. Specifically, he claims that the trial court improperly admitted two pieces of hearsay evidence, that the trial court incorrectly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, and that the State made prejudicial remarks during its closing statement. We affirm.

¶ 2. The following facts are drawn from the testimony of witnesses and the exhibits introduced at trial.

¶ 3. On New Year’s Eve 2013, defendant and his girlfriend, the…