Legal Opinion

Western Material Co. v. Enke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1929No. File No. 6504PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbedd, J.

In May, 1924, defendants Enke, under the name of Enke Construction Company, entered into a contract with the state of South Dakota for the performance of certain construction work on Federal Aid Project No. 164, being a part of state trunk highway.No. 15 in Brookings and Moody counties, S. D. O11 August 11, 1924, defendant and appellant, Federal Surety Company, executed and delivered its certain bond in the penal sum of $62,973.04, guarantying the faithful performance of said construction contract. The contractor commenced his work “sometime the fore part of September, 1924,” and completed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
  3. Columbia County v. Consolidated Contract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. National Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Miller v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & SonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Asset Recovery Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Carpenter v. SusiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Don's Heavy Hauling, Inc. v. Frank D. Malone Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API