Legal Opinion

Swift v. Winkler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1957No. Civ. 22058PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries plaintiff suffered when he fell while in the act of stepping up on the front porch of defendants’ grocery store. Plaintiff charges that his mishap was due to defendants’ negligence. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $5,000. Defendants appeal.

In seeking a reversal defendants make two principal contentions : (1) that they were not negligent; and (2) that counsel for plaintiff, in his voir dire examination of prospective jurors, intentionally and prejudicially conveyed the idea to the jurors that defendants were insured. Since we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Squires v. RiffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Curtis v. McAuliffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Stevenson v. LinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Scally v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Hart v. WieltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Traxler v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Sweet v. StutchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API