People v. Pierce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Defendant Derek Eldeen Pierce appeals following the trial court’s modification of an order requiring defendant to pay restitution to various victims. Defendant contends (1) the trial court erred in modifying the restitution order without vacating the prior order to avoid duplication of the restitution award; (2) the trial court erred in imposing restitution for damages caused by a codefendant because the People explicitly waived the claim; and (3) if both or either of these claims is forfeited due to trial counsel’s failure to object, counsel provided ineffective…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Fernandez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Jones CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Kapral CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. McCuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.