Legal Opinion
People v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 2012No. B175564PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
In 2006, we affirmed the convictions of appellants, Omar Bradley, Amen Rahh, and John Johnson II, for misappropriation and misuse of public funds under Penal Code section 424. Appellants were former high officials of the City of Compton (Compton or City).1 Appellants were alleged to have misappropriated and misused public funds by (1) charging personal expenses to their City credit cards and (2) “double-billing” the City for their travel expenses by obtaining cash advances for the expenses and then, instead of paying for the expenses with cash advanced, charging such expenses…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Nuno, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (HC) Foster v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.