Legal Opinion
Isetts v. Borough of Roseland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 10, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
835 A.2d 330 (2003)
364 N.J. Super. 247
Robert G. ISETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF ROSELAND; Borough of Roseland Department of Police, and in their official and individual capacities, Richard McDonough, Steven Sargese and Michael A. Pacio, Jr., jointly and severally, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 8, 2003.
Decided November 10, 2003.
Daniel C. Fleming, Bedminster, argued the cause for appellant (Wong Fleming, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Fleming and Linda Wong, of counsel and on the brief).
David I. Fox, Livingston, argued the cause for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- MAG v. Division of ABCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Giaccone v. Canopius U.S. InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- In Re Babcock Borsig AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Serrano v. UNDERGROUND UTIL. CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Impink Ex Rel. Baldi v. ReynesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.