Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Cordell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1936No. 26278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Tillman county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against H. B. Cordell, as principal, and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, as surety, to recover on the bond of the said H. JB. Cordell, as Warehouse Commissioner of the state of Oklahoma, the value of certain wheat stored by the plaintiff and his assignors in the elevator of the Carl Cassidy Grain Company, a bonded warehouse licensed by the state of Oklahoma and doing a bonded warehouse business at Frederick, Okla. The parties will be referred to hereinas they appeared in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Keifer v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Mills v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Opinion No. (1992), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API