Legal Opinion
Mills v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1960No. 38837PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
Plaintiff in error instituted this cause, as plaintiff, to recover damages from the defendants in error, a former County Assessor of Oklahoma County, and the surety on his official bond, as defendants, on account of said assessor’s alleged wrongful assessment of two certain city lots plaintiff owned on Northwest 23rd Street in Oklahoma City.
Plaintiff perfected the present appeal, as plaintiff in error, after the trial court sustained defendants’ general demurrer to her second amended petition; and, upon her election to stand on said amended petition, entered judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Gammel v. Ernst & ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Brictson v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Richards v. EllisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Winters v. Governor's Special CommitteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- White v. State ex rel. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Opinion No. (2005), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.