Legal Opinion

Brand v. Sterling Motor Car Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 18, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.

In this action the plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to compensation for services rendered in securing from the Poole Engineering and Machine Company of Baltimore, Maryland (hereinafter called the Poole Company), contracts for work required in the manufacture of certain ammunition shells, and in and under an agreement with the defendant relating to a contract with the United States for the manufacture of such shells.

Count one of the declaration relates to services in securing contracts with the Poole Company and count five is founded on the agreement as to the contract with the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Robinson v. Van AukenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Caston v. QuimbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Karcz v. Luther Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Fenton v. Federal Street Building TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Factory Realty Corp. v. Corbin-Holmes Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Globe Paper Co. v. Russell Box Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API