Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Strauss

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhutsttansox, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note in tie sum of $361, dated December 1st, 1919, and payable December 1st, 1930,.executed and delivered by the defendant to tlie plaintiff bank. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer admitted tbe execution of the note, but alleged that it was given solely as an accommodation to the plaintiff bank, and that defendant received no consideration therefor whatsoever. Plaintiff interposed a reply, denying all the new matter set forth in the answer. The case was tried to a jury upon the issue thus framed. At the close of all the testimony a verdict was *72d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Jones v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thoe v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Westerso v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Meske v. MelicherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API