Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1939No. File No. 6600Published

1DissentBurr, J.

I am of the opinion that in determining whether it is reversible error for the trial court to grant the motion for directed verdict, we should not consider the question of the quality of the evidence at the time the motion was granted.

There has been a progressive attitude on the part of the court to view a violation of this statute involved as not reversible error if the court be satisfied as a matter of fact that the moving party would be entitled to a verdict on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

We have always held the view and stated distinctly that it is error so to do.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rokusek v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lucas v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Rattie v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Small v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Atkinson v. NeblettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API